On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 20:56 -0700, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> --- Simon Kitching <skitching@apache.org> wrote:
> > I'd be happy with including this approach in the
> > next release, removing
> > the redundant isXYZAvailable methods and calling the
> > next release 1.1.
> > In practice, I'm sure no-one *does* subclass
> > LogFactoryImpl so there's
> > no problem. In fact I'd be happier with this than a
> > 1.0.5 where the
> > methods exist but don't do anything.
> >
>
> +1
Ok. So questions:
* Robert are you ok with adopting Brian's approach to
checking a logger is ok (by creating one) rather than
using the current isXYZAvailable?
* Robert, are you ok with ripping out the isXYZAvailable
methods and calling the next release 1.1?
* Brian: if Robert's ok with this (and no-one else
votes -1), will you prepare an actual patch or should I?
By the way, Brian, are you an Apache committer?
Regards,
Simon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
|