commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [chain] Serializability of base impls
Date Thu, 01 Dec 2005 01:40:35 GMT
On 11/30/05, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Recently, while looking at a codebase that uses Commons Chain, I was
> drawn to the top commit message for ContextBase [1].
>
> I'm interested in knowing what the developer (and user too) opinions
> are on this topic. Has anybody made any progress on this?
>
> Does anyone have a preference among -
>
>  * Keep base impls inherently serializable, but let subclass
> implementors make their own decisions about serializability. This is
> probably a good idea for any Commons library, since interfaces can't
> be "un-inherited" (quoting the commit message). I think this action
> will warrant a major release, and rework on ContextBase (to not
> inherit HashMap) amongst other things.

Whats wrong with HashMap - it implements Serializable?

Niall

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message