commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Torsten Curdt <>
Subject Re: [jci] patches
Date Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:32:04 GMT
> Groovy no  
> longer allows null CompilerConfiguration
> I'm also just writting a simple CompilerFactory class.


> Once that is done I'll weigh up either ripping jci
> into the Drools tree sans common-logging requirement or build an  
> event model instead.

We should work something out ...unfortunately I have
been a little busy the past few weeks. So not much
progress here. The bytecode removal seems to be a
bit tricky as it's not really clear where the logging
part starts and where it stops. Probably possible
but tricky.

I really dislike the idea of a fork at this stage.
As of the event model - it just feels a bit like
re-inventing commons-logging.

Couldn't you rather mock the commons-logging API?
That way everything is fine as it is and IF someone
wants to plug in some logging he just have to replace
the mocks with the real commons-logging.


View raw message