commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Bourg <>
Subject Re: [logging] JCL2.0 design - API
Date Thu, 02 Mar 2006 14:25:57 GMT
Boris Unckel wrote:
> To turn Log into an abstract class means that no native implementation will
> ever be possible. It would definitly mean that you will need an wrapper
> class. Currently there is just x4juli supporting native JCL support for
> java.util.logging (X4JuliLogger extends jul.Logger implements JCL).
> But this is also a chance for log4j2.

What do you mean by "native" implementation ? Do you mean a multiple 
inheritance to implement the Log type from JCL and the Logger type from 
java.util.logging ?

Emmanuel Bourg

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message