commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "" <>
Subject Re: [functor] Revisited?
Date Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:40:55 GMT
Matt Benson schrieb:
> --- James Carman <> wrote:
>> So, if we want to revive it, do we start working on
>> it within the
>> "dormant" folder or should we move it back into
>> sandbox or proper (I
>> think it was in proper at one time)?
> Was it?  I'd thought it hadn't gotten past the
> sandbox... Actually, it might be nice to dust it off
> and get it up to speed--if not in time for Collections
> 4.0, then at _least_ in time for Collections 5.0
> (generics).  It sure would be nice to have a release
> compatible with 4.0, though.
> Update: yep, this from STATUS.txt in functor:
> "Commons Functor is a currently a "sandboxed" project.
>  It has
>   not yet been accepted as an offical part of of the
> Apache Commons
>   project."
> We should be able to hold a quick vote, then
> re-sandbox IMO.

No need to hold a vote IMO. This is just a sandbox project, and you've
already got support from
 James Carman
 Matt Benson
 and add me too..

I suggest using lazy-consensus, ie do it and then discuss if someone


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message