commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Liam Coughlin <>
Subject Re: [DBUTILS] Version numbering
Date Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:43:03 GMT
That makes a little more sense then how I read the Stephen originally, and
yes you're probably right -- though I don't think you're going to be able to
get much varargs in without wrecking binary anyway since a lot of the
parameter ordering doesn't lend itself to it.

I just don't feel that a 1.3 java 5 "Now with Special Sauce but  the Same
Old Hamburger" release would be all that useful in the long run, but i could
be completely wrong.

-L <>> wrote:
> > "NEEDS" is a little strong....  I think there's room in the world for a
> > backwards-compatible dbutils 1.3 with generics and varargs followed
> shortly
> > afterward by a more thoroughly re-worked dbutils 2.0.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message