commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [JEXL] 2.0 and BSF / JSR-223
Date Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:21:15 GMT
On 29/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:41 PM, sebb<sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > Although Jexl 2.0 works OK currently with Apache BSF 3.0, it relies on
>  > the factory & engine provided by BSF 3.0.
>  >
>  > Now Java 1.6 has scripting built-in, so I think it would make sense to
>  > include the necessary classes and property file in Jexl. This would
>  > allow it to be used without the BSF jar.
>  >
>
> <snip/>
>
>  Right, JEXL shouldn't have additional dependencies (even optional) but
>  javax.script is almost part of the JDK (we are at JDK 1.5, but thats
>  OK IMO).

JEXL does currently require commons-logging (non-optional).

I'm not sure how useful the logging is - should it be kept?
Could it be made optional at run-time?

>
>  > It should still work with the BSF jar as well - BeanShell takes a
>  > similar approach and works OK for me with BSF 3.0 or Java 1.6.
>  >
>  > I'll have a look at providing these classes shortly.
>
>
>
> Cool.
>
>  -Rahul
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message