commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guillaume Nodet <>
Subject Re: [all] OSGI - POOL-160
Date Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:13:06 GMT
I'm not a committer on commons, but I've diagnosed the issue we had in
ServiceMix with the commons-pool bundles.
I can confirm that the patch is the right way to go.   If a bundle
acting as a library imports its own exported packages, you're bound to
a lot of problems.

This problem applies to all releases of commons-pool and maybe to
other commons-xxx components.
I need to try if, but a better way might be to change the
commons-parent pom with something like:


This should work the same (i.e. not import our own exports), but be
applicable to all modules.

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:31, Phil Steitz <> wrote:
> Can someone knowledgeable in OSGi header construction please have a
> look at POOL-160.  IIUC, this applies to all recently released
> commons components (unless [pool] is somehow individually borked).
> Thanks!
> Phil
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

Guillaume Nodet
Open Source SOA

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message