commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jacob Beard <>
Subject Re: [scxml-eclipse] User Feedback
Date Mon, 09 Aug 2010 01:22:40 GMT
Hi, Long,

Replies below:

On 10-08-08 09:06 PM, Xun Long Gui wrote:
> I do not think we can create a transition without a target, target is a
> necessary element for a transition.
The spec says that the target attribute on transition is not required.
In that case, I think the semantics are similar to a Static Reaction, as
defined in the paper describing the Rhapsody semantics of statecharts.
>From the spec:

The identifier(s) of the state or parallel region to transition to. If
it is omitted, the transition will not cause a change in the state
configuration when it is executed. The executable content contained in
the transition will still be executed, so the transition will function
as a simple event handler. If the target is present and equal to the
state containing the transition element, the transition will cause the
state machine to leave and then re-enter this state.

> To feature 1 and 3 in Chris's commends, we can achieve them, not a big
> thing. What do you mean about "showstoppers" bug ?
What I mean is that I think these things are critical to usability.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message