commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <>
Subject Re: [Math] Code review
Date Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:25:20 GMT
Another option is to have a small community of activists who are willing to
comb the code and improve it without requiring everybody to catch all these

On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Phil Steitz <> wrote:

> From my perspective, checkstyle.xml effectively represents our coding style
> rules.  I am fine with people making cosmetic changes that go beyond what is
> specified in those checks, but I am -1 on requiring access to or specifying
> usage of any specific IDE to ensure compliance with [math] coding standards.
> I am also fine with adding other static code analysis plugins such as
> findbugs to point out potential bugs, as long as we maintain the associated
> config files and uniformly either fix or manage exceptions.  Here again,
> tools need to be freely available and IDE-independent if we expect the
> community to use them.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message