commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Thomas <>
Subject Re: [dbcp][pool] Combined jar?
Date Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:45:05 GMT
On 10/02/2011 04:42, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I ran into commons-dbcp-all-1.3-r699049.jar on a tomcat host that I
> was looking at the other day.  Googling led me to openEJB, which
> appears to bundle and mirror this jar
> (o.a.openejb/commons-dbcp-all).  I suspect that what happened is
> that they got tired of waiting for dbcp 1.3 and cut a version based
> on the revision number above and bundling required classes from pool
> 1.3 (at least that's what it looks like from the manifest).   My
> immediate reaction was to encourage the OpenEJB ppl to upgrade to
> the released version of dbcp 1.3 and the latest pool release.  This
> led to question above.  Should we just start providing
> commons-dbcp-all?

I'd rather not. I'd prefer we did more frequent releases (he says
knowing he has been focussed on Tomcat rather more then commons since
the 1.3/1/4 release).

>   Or should we just point them at release tags to use?

That would be better. I'd prefer that they just used the standard jars.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message