commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Sterijevski <>
Subject Re: [math] Re: Longley Data
Date Tue, 12 Jul 2011 19:12:27 GMT

So I included the wampler data in the test suite. The interesting thing, is
to get clean runs I need wider tolerances with OLSMultipleRegression than
with the version of the Miller algorithm I am coding up.

Perhaps we should come to a consensus of what good enough is? How close do
we want to be? Should we require passing on all of NIST's 'hard' problems?
(for all regression techniques that get cooked up)


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message