commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <>
Subject Re: [JEXL] Are users likely to implement the Script interface?
Date Sun, 04 Dec 2011 18:52:00 GMT
On 4 December 2011 18:46, henrib <> wrote:
> sebb-2-2 wrote
>> Don't know if this is an indication that the unit tests are incomplete
>> or that there is not really a use case for implementing the interface,
>> (other than the implementations which are already supplied.)
> I don't think anyone would implement the Script interface without deriving /
> delegating to an ExpressionImpl which is internal (by transitivity from the
> protected ASTJexlScript member); so it'b be someone trying to extend Jexl
> capabilities.
> Jexl being usually featured and used as a glue / joint, JEXL Scripts are
> usually used as classes members thus implementing Script is very unlikely.

OK, thanks.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message