commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject Re: [Math] Make everything "Serializable" ?
Date Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:02:33 GMT
In this case , I am more prone in an API to provide a Wrapper Class
that provides a Serializable view , rather than make everything
Serializable or not. 

Leandro A. Pezzente.

On viernes, 10 de febrero de 2012 at 4:41 PM, Gilles Sadowski 

This is an issue raised in relation to this JIRA ticket:

My position is that there should not be a discussion each time someone
a class to be "Serializable". Ideally, the rule should be clear enough
the developer of a new class knows whether it should be made
or not.
Either we decide to not get in the way, ever, by making everything
"Serializable", or we think that some classes should be "Serializable"
others should not, for some reason. [And IMHO that reason should be
substantial than someone opening a ticket saying "Please make this
Serializable because I need it".]
However, because the second alternative is likely to generate
debates not worth the energy, I shall stop even trying to defend this
point-of-view. ;)
Best regards,

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message