commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maurizio Cucchiara <>
Subject Re: [OGNL] CacheException
Date Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:18:50 GMT
The only case is, as I said before, the [3] (take a look at lines 71-78).
In this case two checked exceptions are encapsulated in a CacheException.
But I think that we can live with them, maybe we will come back later.

So if there are no objection, I would change the hierarchy of
CacheException to a RuntimeException (with this change the integration is
practically insignificant, apart from the package name)

Twitter     :
G+          :
Linkedin    :

Maurizio Cucchiara

On 1 February 2012 17:03, Christian Grobmeier <> wrote:

> Therefore the CachedException is more or
> less an exception which is somehow produced at runtime, due to a
> programming error. Sounds like a runtime exception for me, but  I
> would love to hear why you are not thinking different

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message