commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ricardo Espírito Santo <ricardoespsa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Launcher]
Date Thu, 06 Jun 2013 20:14:25 GMT
So what happens now ? Do we have a time limit on this voting to merge the
projects?

Ricardo Espírito Santo


On 6 June 2013 05:13, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:11 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 5 June 2013 22:53, Ricardo Espírito Santo <ricardoespsanto@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Ok a bit more educated about the [exec] project now and yes I do
> believe
> > > [exec] is sort of too small to be left on its own.
> > >
> > > I liked the idea of merging it into [launcher] or the other way around
> > but
> > > then I liked your next idea even better merging them both into [lang]
> ...
> > >
> > > However, on a second thought, [lang] was never intended to be doing all
> > > this sort of ninja third party code execution stuff that both
> [launcher]
> > > and [exec] aim to.
> > >
> > > The closest [lang] comes to external code execution seems to be on
> > > the org.apache.commons.lang3.SystemUtils and even that is only meant to
> > > extend the functionality of java.lang.System which doesn't contain any
> of
> > > the code execution stuff (apart from load() and loadLibrary())
> > >
> > > I believe it would then be better to merge them [launcher] and [exec]
> but
> > > leave them out of [lang] at least for now.
> > >
> > > Do you agree?
> >
> > I agree that LANG is out of scope for EXEC and LAUNCHER.
> >
>
> OK, what about merging exec and launcher?
>
> Gary
>
> >
> > > Ricardo Espírito Santo
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5 June 2013 09:33, Ricardo Espírito Santo <
> ricardoespsanto@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> I have to admit that I am not very familiar with [exec] ...
> > >>
> > >> Let me have a look at [exec] (in about 9 hours) and I'll let you know
> > what
> > >> I think about it.
> > >>
> > >> Ricardo Espírito Santo
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 4 June 2013 23:09, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Ricardo Espírito Santo <
> > >>> ricardoespsanto@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > Hi Gary,
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Thanks for your reply!
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I kinda was expecting that answer but I'm sort of curious as to
> what
> > >>> > happens to a project that gets no love from anyone for a long
> while?
> > >>> >
> > >>> > The reason I'm asking this is that I have been buzzing around
the
> > >>> commons
> > >>> > projects for a few days trying to find something I could be useful
> at
> > >>> and
> > >>> > seem to find projects that have a few good ideas as JIRAs some
even
> > with
> > >>> > patches attached but then have literally no action since two years
> or
> > >>> so...
> > >>> >
> > >>> > So I guess my real question now is 'Is it possible to retake
> control
> > of
> > >>> a
> > >>> > project which has been left semi-abandoned?'
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>> Yes, development is based on contributions from the community.
> > >>>
> > >>> WRT [launcher], I wonder if we could merge it with [exec]. They seem
> > to do
> > >>> the same kind of thing. They could be both folded into [lang] AFAIAC.
> > >>>
> > >>> WDYT?
> > >>>
> > >>> Gary
> > >>>
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Ricardo Espírito Santo
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On 4 June 2013 22:28, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > Hi,
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > No one is "in charge" of any Commons component. The community
> > develops
> > >>> > and
> > >>> > > supports Commons as each participant and member sees fit.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Gary
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Ricardo Espírito Santo <
> > >>> > > ricardoespsanto@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > > Is there anyone in charge of this project?
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Thanks,
> > >>> > > > Ricardo Espírito Santo
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > --
> > >>> > > E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> > >>> > > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<
> > >>> > > http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> > >>> > > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <
> http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> > >>> > > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> > >>> > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> > >>> > > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> > >>> > > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> > >>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<
> > >>> http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> > >>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> > >>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> > >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> > >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> > >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<
> http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message