commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ate Douma <>
Subject Re: [SCXML] Next major version number required package rename needed?
Date Thu, 10 Oct 2013 23:29:43 GMT
On 10/11/2013 01:16 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Commons SCXML has only one reverse dependency in Maven Central,
> flexistate, so I wouldn't bother with the binary compatibility and just
> keep the package as is.

Hmm. That might be the only reverse dependency of artifacts also deployed to 
Maven Central, but I'm pretty sure SCXML 0.9 is used in plenty of projects which 
might be impacted still.

I would expect stronger arguments to decide yes/no if a package rename is 
required or not. This would seem a bit (too) arbitrary to me.

Mind you, I'd prefer not having to do a package rename, but I got the impression 
there are more explicit 'rules' when to do so.

So I'd still would like to hear more explicitly if such a rule is defined, and 
if so how it is worded and where. But of course if there is none, fine by me :)

Thanks, Ate

> Emmanuel Bourg
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message