commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Move Apache Commons to Git for SCM...
Date Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:01:07 GMT
2013/10/11 Oliver Heger <oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de>

> Am 11.10.2013 02:10, schrieb Phil Steitz:
> >
> >
> >> On Oct 10, 2013, at 4:41 PM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Even I like git and use it daily, I will vote +0,5.
> >>
> >> Why other apache projects need to have their own commons-csv
> >> repackaged release? why tomcat need to use a svn:external on dbcp
> >> instead of a released version? why servicemix need to repackage all
> >> commons jar to have proper osgi bundles?
> >>
> >> I simply believe moving to git won't fix those problems about the too
> >> complicated release process which scare folks here to try releasing a
> >> component!!
> >> So no release happen at the end....
> >>
> > I agree that the release process is certainly a problem; but the big
> problem IMO is just too many components for too few really active
> committers.  Once we actually have something ready to release, we have
> generally been able to fumble our way through the process.  The problem is
> getting there.
> >
> > I think the best thing we can do is focus on getting some things ready
> for release.  I will help on pool, DBCP, math.  I won't rob Mark of the
> oppty to rm pool2, but will help ;). All are welcome to join the fun
> cleaning up the docs and other loose ends on that and then dbcp2.
> >
> > Who wants to step up to drive some other things  to release?
> I plan to prepare a release of BeanUtils soon.
>

Good to hear. There is a lot to do. I started generification a while back.
If you like you can join #asfcommons and we can have a talk about BU.

Benedikt


>
> Oliver
>
> >
> > Phil
> >>
> >>> On 11 October 2013 01:50, James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com>
> wrote:
> >>> All,
> >>>
> >>> We have had some great discussions about moving our SCM to Git.  I
> >>> think it's time to put it to a vote.  So, here we go:
> >>>
> >>> +1 - yes, move to Git
> >>> -1 - no, do not move to Git
> >>>
> >>> The vote will be left open for 72 hours.  Go!
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Olivier Lamy
> >> Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
> >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message