commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Compress 1.6
Date Sun, 13 Oct 2013 21:03:36 GMT
--
Olivier
On Oct 14, 2013 6:39 AM, "Phil Steitz" <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/12/13 10:31 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > since Compress 1.5 we've fixed a few bugs but most notably added
> > read-only support for LZMA standalone, uncompressed ARJ and full support
> > for 7z.
> >
> > I have not created a RC website as the only difference to the current
> > website would be the download page and the version number - and I'd
> > immediately change the site after the release to include the release
> > date anyway.
> >
> > Foo 1.2 RC1 is available for review here:
> >     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/compress/
> >     (svn revision 3254)
> >
> >   Maven artifacts are here:
> >
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-167/org/apache/commons/commons-compress/1.6/
> >
> >   Details of changes since 1.5 are in the release notes:
> >
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/compress/tags/COMPRESS-1.6-RC1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> >
> >   The tag is here:
> >
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/compress/tags/COMPRESS-1.6-RC1/
> >     (svn revision 1531616)
> >
> >   Site:
> >     http://commons.apache.org/compress/
> >
> >   Clirr Report (compared to 1.5):
> >     http://commons.apache.org/compress/clirr-report.html
> >
> >   RAT Report:
> >     http://commons.apache.org/compress/rat-report.html
> >
> >   KEYS:
> >   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> >
> >   Please review the release candidate and vote.
> >   This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after 0530
> >   GMT 16-October 2013 - given that I'll be traveling the second half of
> >   this week I'd rather expect the release to happen next Saturday.
> >
> >   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> >   [ ] +0 OK, but...
> >   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> >   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> +0
> Code builds fine for me on OSX 1.7.0_21-b12
> Jar, tarball contents, notice, license look fine.
> Sigs, hashes are good.
> +0 instead of +1 because the title on the release notes is incorrect
> - should be 1.6.
>
> One thing to verify:  the manifest says the build was done using
> 1.6.0_27.  Is that recent enough to include the fix for the javadoc
> XSS vulnerabilty?

Last maven javadoc plugin fix that without jdk requirement

>
> Phil
>
> Phil
> >
> >   Thanks!
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message