commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release
Date Tue, 31 Dec 2013 11:04:56 GMT
2013/12/31 Jason Pyeron <jpyeron@pdinc.us>

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sebb
> > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 17:17
> >
> > On 30 December 2013 21:21, Jason Pyeron <jpyeron@pdinc.us> wrote:
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Benedikt Ritter
> > >> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 14:19
> > >>
> > >> Hello Jason,
> > >>
> > >> sorry, I don't understand what exactly you have in mind.
> > Can you give
> > >> some examples?
> > >
> > > The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the
> > >
> > > "package ognl;"
> > >
> > > declarations, where as the apache releases will use
> > >
> > > "package org.apache.commons.ognl;"
> > >
> > > I would create a set of proxy classes in the old package
> > space which
> > > call the classes in the new space.
> >
> > These will only be required for a small proportion of users,
> > so I suggest they are packaged in a separate jar.
>
> That was always assumed. The question would it be appropiate for an Apache
> release, or should it be released elsewhere.
>

Our software usually uses the org.apache.commons namespace. I'm not sure if
this is an absolute requirement. To me it feels like these adapters should
be developed and maintained else where. Thoughts?

Benedikt


>
> >
> > >>
> > >> 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron <jpyeron@pdinc.us>
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > From: Lukasz Lenart
> > >> > > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 10:51
> > >> > >
> > >> > > 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron <jpyeron@pdinc.us>:
> > >> > > > There are a lot of formatting chenges between the version
> > >> > > in git and apache svn.
> > >> > > > I am still looking for "patches" in git not yet applied
to
> > >> > > subversion,
> > >> > > > do you know of any?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > All should be already applied or don't affect Apache's version
> > >> >
> > >> > I was thinking that a set of classes to wrap the
> > org.apache classes
> > >> > should be made for users of the legacy releases until they
> > >> are ready
> > >> > to update their code bases.
> > >> >
> > >> > What does anyone else think? Ping Struts folks...
> > >
> > > jpyeron@black /projects/struts
> > > $ grep -r 'import ognl' . | grep -v ./.svn/ | grep -v test <snip/>
> > >
> > ./struts2/trunk/xwork-core/src/main/java/com/opensymphony/xwork2/ognl/
> > > accessor/O bjectProxyPropertyAccessor.java:import ognl.OgnlContext;
> > > <snip/>
> > >
> > > jpyeron@black /projects/struts
> > > $ grep -r 'import ognl' . | grep -v ./.svn/ | grep -v test | wc -l
> > > 54
> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > Could those be an apache package? Or must they be from
> > "elsewhere"
> > >> > since they will have the non-conformant package names.
> > >> >
>
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> -                                                               -
> - Jason Pyeron                      PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
> - Principal Consultant              10 West 24th Street #100    -
> - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333            Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
> -                                                               -
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message