commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [beanutils2] Assertions class vs. lang Validate
Date Mon, 03 Mar 2014 10:43:14 GMT
go for it! :)

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi


On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Benedikt Ritter <britter@apache.org> wrote:

> Hello André
>
> 2014-03-03 9:57 GMT+01:00 André Diermann <andre.diermann@gmail.com>:
>
> > 2014-03-03 9:10 GMT+01:00 Benedikt Ritter <britter@apache.org>:
> > >
> > >
> > > The stuff that we have implemented in the Assertions class can be
> > replaced
> > > by the methods available in Objects from java 7. You're right about
> > > MethodUtil and TypeUtil.
> > >
> > >
> > Just to be clear what you mean by replace:
> > - wrapping the methods from Objects in the Assertions class to keep the
> API
> > or
> > - get rid of the Assertions class completly and directly use the methods
> > from Objects class.
> >
> > If okay, I would like to create a ticket and to provide a patch for this
> > tonight :)
> >
>
> I'd say let's go for the latter. Assertions is an internal class (package
> private) so there is no need to keep it.
>
> Benedikt
>
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Yes, but a test dependency doesn't get pulled in a user declares a
> > > dependency to BU2. It's just that we don't want that users have lang in
> > > their class path just because we need two or three methods here and
> > there.
> > >
> >
> > Ok, that makes sense. :)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> http://github.com/britter
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message