commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [beanutils2] Assertions class vs. lang Validate
Date Sat, 01 Mar 2014 16:32:10 GMT
My preference would be for components like [io] and [lang] to be reused
from other components as a dependency in order to avoid this kind of
duplication.

Gary


On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 11:27 AM, André Diermann <andre.diermann@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I noticed that the majority (all?) functionality of the Assertions class is
> already covert by commons-lang Validate [1].
>
> For instance Assertions.checkNotNull() is an equivalent to
> Validate.notNull().
>
> Is there a reason for this?
>
> Regards,
> André
>
> [1]
>
> http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-lang/javadocs/api-release/index.html
>



-- 
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message