commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bernd Eckenfels <e...@zusammenkunft.net>
Subject Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)
Date Wed, 03 Dec 2014 08:29:45 GMT
Hello,

I checked the release-plugin documentation and I cannot find a way to
specify different tags for the usage inside the prepared POM and the
Tag which should be used for actually tagging.

I also think this is pretty uncommon, and I would go with using the
final release version tag (commons-vfs2-project-2.1 or
commons-vfs-2.1 or vfs-2.1 depending on the outcome of the discusssion).

As mentioned before, I am fine with having at least one non-final RC
produced using a RC tag and the commons.rc.version=RC1 specified. But
as soon as we think we can produce a result I woul run the release
plugin with the final tag.

BTW: -P apache-release does not work with VFS as it fails the
source:single execution (missing assembly descriptor which is in dist/
for VFS). It seems to work with -Prelease, do we want to use this?

Gruss
Bernd

 Am Tue, 2 Dec 2014 22:50:03 -0700
schrieb Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com>:

> > 
> > > Unfortunately, I don’t believe I
> > > documented the release process but it should be similar to
> > > http://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4j2ReleaseGuide
> > > <http://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4j2ReleaseGuide>
> > > <http://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4j2ReleaseGuide
> > > <http://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4j2ReleaseGuide>>, since I
> > > based the Log4j build and release process after VFS.
> > 
> > 
> > Before we do this, a couple of questions:
> > 
> > - how hard is it to delete tags from SVN and who can do that?
> > 
> > You should not delete tags from SVN. If you can commit, you can
> > manage tags and branches AFAIK. IMO, the process should be that we
> > VOTE on an RC tag, if the vote passes the RC tag is copied to a
> > release tag. If it fails, you try again with a new RC tag. The tags
> > live in SVN as a record of what we VOTEd on.
> > 
> 
> I  recall that at the time of the 2.0 release the release plugin used
> the same version as the artifact for tagging, but I could be wrong.
> I seem to recall that now the tag does not have to match, so what
> Gary is suggesting should be doable.
> 
> Ralph
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message