commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject Re: [RDF] grant Commons RDF (incubating) permission to deploy artifacts to org.apache.commons groupId
Date Tue, 05 May 2015 01:05:07 GMT
It is such a common pattern to have the artifactId begin with the last part
of the groupId that the OSGi bundle plugin handles that case out of the box.

Top-posting because I'm on my phone. Sorry.
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 8:49 PM Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wrote:

> Try mailing repository@
>
>
>
> > On May 4, 2015, at 12:32 PM, Benedikt Ritter <britter@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > 2015-05-04 18:46 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> On 5/3/15 11:56 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Sergio Fernández <wikier@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>> we're discussing our first incubating release, and we came to the
> >> issue
> >>>>> that we are not grant with permissions to deploy maven artifacts
to
> >> the
> >>>>> org.apache.commons groupId [1].
> >>>> Why org.apache.commons, and not, say, org.apache.commons.rdf? The
> >>>> former seems overly broad to me.
> >>>
> >>> Could be we should have gone that way years ago when we moved to
> >>> org.apache.commons:commons-foo; but that ship has sailed, so I think
> >>> its best to stay consistent with the rest of the components and
> >>> proceed as proposed.
> >>
> >> Some rambling thoughts (tm):
> >>
> >> I like to 'fix' things too but I was on the fence about this one until
> now.
> >> Yes, there is a redundancy because the substring 'commons' is in the
> >> AID/GID twice; but that is OK I claim. Why? The GID is the TLP ID, so of
> >> course we have o.a.commons, that's a must. The AID is the component,
> which
> >> I always call Commons Foo, and sometimes Apache Commons Foo when I want
> to
> >> make it clear to folks (at work for example) that I am talking about
> >> software hosted at Apache. If I were to talk within Apache about Foo, I
> bet
> >> some folks would not know what Foo is or where it lives. If I say
> 'Commons
> >> Foo' then it's obvious (I hope). That is how I justify to myself the
> >> commons in the AID.
> >>
> >> FWIW: Over at Log4j, we have "log4j-" as the prefix for all module
> names,
> >> and no one seems to mind.
> >
> > I'm all for consistency. VFS does it this way, Weaver does it this way,
> > Chain does it this way. And GID matching TLP ID makes sense as well.
> >
> > Who can grant the necessary permissions?
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Phil
> >>>>
> >>>> Jochen
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> >> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> >> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> > http://github.com/britter
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message