commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Phil Steitz <>
Subject Re: [RESULT] [math] Name of the new TLP
Date Mon, 01 Feb 2016 13:49:02 GMT
On 2/1/16 6:24 AM, Gilles wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:20:14 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Unscientifically, but in the interest of keeping things moving, it
>> looks to me like just plain "math" is the winner.  Any objections to
>> moving forward with this name?
>> Phil
> Proposals were not all presented when people gave opinions.
> A [VOTE] perhaps?

Yes, we could do a poll and if you or others feel that is necessary,
I will kick it off.  It just looked to me like we were close enough
to consensus on math as the name to make it binary.  Do you have
objections to that name?  Does anyone else prefer to do a poll?

> Actually: Who should vote, or not?
> [Logic would have it that people they do not intend to join
> development of the new project should not...]
> Gilles
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message