commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons-VFS2 2.1 rc0
Date Tue, 03 May 2016 00:37:13 GMT
Josh Elser wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>> On 2 May 2016 at 15:00, Josh Elser<> wrote:
>>> > Also, please re-read the end of the previous thread on compatibility.
>>> >
>>> > I clearly stated that there were some changes which I consider not
>>> worth
>>> > changing about the TarArchiveEntry code. If you feel like these are
>>> not
>>> > acceptable, please start a discussion about this so you can come to
>>> > consensus on how the changes should be addressed.
>> The release vote mail really needs to include all the release-specific
>> information that the reviewer needs to do the review.
>> If there are caveats etc relating to the Clirr report these need to be
>> included in the vote mail.
>> Both to make it easier for the reviewers, and for the historical
>> record to show that these items were considered.
> Ok, this was not made clear to me. Thank you for letting me know. I'd
> encourage you to update your project's website. For other projects, I
> assume that those voting would have the context from previous
> discussions, but acknowledge that this is not how commons operates.

Sebb -- would addressing these points in the release notes cause you to 
change your -1 to a +1? I'd like to make all the changes I can ASAP and 
roll the next RC. Because I haven't said it explicitly -- thanks for 
taking the time to give all of the feedback that you have already.

Everyone else -- even though Sebb voted -1 on rc0, I would greatly 
appreciate if everyone could still look through rc0 and give any more 
feedback which would keep you from a +1.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message