commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [ALL] Why is the component's web site part of the release vote?
Date Thu, 08 Dec 2016 11:26:31 GMT
On 8 December 2016 at 09:33, Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2016-12-08, Gilles wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>
>> I've just noticed a small problem in the (staged) web site
>> submitted for the release of Commons RNG v1.0:
>>   http://home.apache.org/~erans/commons-rng-1.0-RC6-site/rat-report.html
>
>> Since this must be fixed in the regenerated site will
>> not reflect the released version number, why do we
>> actually have to vote on the site?
>
> IMHO we don't really vote on the site. For all the COMPRESS releases
> I've always said "this is not the site I'm going to publish when the
> release is final" and it's been fine. We can publish the site
> independently of releases and maybe don't do that often enough.
>
> The site is part of the vote template as it provides access to a couple
> of reports that may be interesting to people voting. A RAT report that
> shows a violation is a reason to vote with -1. But that doesn't mean we
> are voting on the site.

Agreed.
Also it's useful to have people review the site in case there are any
obvious mistakes in documentation.

> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message