commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit
Date Sun, 05 Nov 2017 15:43:06 GMT
It sounds like we all like the idea of this new component. I'll create the
git repo tonight or by tomorrow morning at the latest.

Gary

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
wrote:

> This daemon thing is interesting, I something similar to dump each N
> seconds threads to investigate some tests locking on a CI. Can goes
> there as well probably.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>
>
> 2017-11-05 16:23 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>:
> > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> So are you advocating for a multi-module project?
> >>
> >> - commons-testing
> >> - commons-testing-junit4
> >> - commons-testing-junit5
> >>
> >> ?
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Bernd Eckenfels <
> ecki@zusammenkunft.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I like the idea (and prefer Commons Testing), for example a method to
> >>> list all non-daemon threads after a test run (to see there is no
> resource
> >>> leak) can be used independent of the Unit Test Framework.
> >>>
> >>
> > Do you have such a gadget?
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> >>
> >>> Gruss
> >>> Bernd
> >>> --
> >>> http://bernd.eckenfels.net
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> From: Hasan Diwan <hasan.diwan@gmail.com>
> >>> Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2017 5:42:39 PM
> >>> To: Commons Developers List
> >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit
> >>>
> >>> How about "Apache Commons Testing"? -- H
> >>>
> >>> On 4 November 2017 at 09:10, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Pascal Schumacher <
> >>> > pascalschumacher@gmx.net>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > JUnit 5 is not backwards compatible (Package/Annotation-Names
have
> >>> > > changed, Rules were replaced by a new extension model), but it
can
> run
> >>> > > JUnit 3 and JUnit 4 Tests if you add an additional dependency.
See
> >>> > > http://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/user-guide/#migrating-f
> >>> rom-junit4
> >>> > > for details.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > OK, so "Apache Commons Extras for Junit 4"
> >>> >
> >>> > Gary
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Am 04.11.2017 um 15:53 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> I am assuming that JUnit 5 will be backward compatible with
JUnit
> 4,
> >>> I
> >>> > >> might be wrong. I'd like to focus on a single dependency for
now
> >>> (JUnit)
> >>> > >> and not do a multi-module project. If someone want to do the
same
> for
> >>> > >> TestNG, then have at it. KISS and small for 1.0.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Gary
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita <
> >>> > >> brunodepaulak@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> +1 for the idea and for looking at JUnit 5.x and maybe AssertJ.
> >>> > >>> CheersBruno
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>        From: Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>
> >>> > >>>   To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> >>> > >>>   Sent: Saturday, 4 November 2017 1:44 PM
> >>> > >>>   Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Commons JUnit
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> I certainly like the idea, especially if the docs are
good about
> >>> > pulling
> >>> > >>> in
> >>> > >>> other related dependencies to complement the whole thing.
General
> >>> > >>> resource
> >>> > >>> management rules would be great, though, like the ones
we have in
> >>> > Log4j.
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> Also, I haven't looked closely at it yet, but supporting
JUnit
> 5.x
> >>> as
> >>> > >>> well
> >>> > >>> would be nice.
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> On 3 November 2017 at 18:11, Gary Gregory <
> garydgregory@gmail.com>
> >>> > >>> wrote:
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> Hi All,
> >>> > >>>>
> >>> > >>>> I'd propose we start a new component called "Apache
Commons
> JUnit".
> >>> > >>>>
> >>> > >>>> The goal would be to gather useful and reusable code
like JUnit
> >>> rules.
> >>> > >>>>
> >>> > >>>> This component would be focused on JUnit 4.x only.
> >>> > >>>>
> >>> > >>>> For example: org.apache.commons.collections4.junit.
> >>> > >>>> SetDefaultLocaleTestRule
> >>> > >>>>
> >>> > >>>> I have other rules stashed here and there as well,
for example a
> >>> Set
> >>> > >>>> Default Charset Rule.
> >>> > >>>>
> >>> > >>>> Thoughts?
> >>> > >>>>
> >>> > >>>> Gary
> >>> > >>>>
> >>> > >>>>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> --
> >>> > >>> Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >
> >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> >>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> OpenPGP:
> >>> https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xFEBAD7FFD041BBA1
> >>> If you wish to request my time, please do so using
> >>> http://bit.ly/hd1ScheduleRequest.
> >>> Si vous voudrais faire connnaisance, allez a
> >>> http://bit.ly/hd1ScheduleRequest.
> >>>
> >>> <https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=
> 0xFEBAD7FFD041BBA1
> >>> >Sent
> >>> from my mobile device
> >>> Envoye de mon portable
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message