commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Bodewig <>
Subject Re: [All] Convention for "courtesy" codes?
Date Sat, 10 Feb 2018 14:17:20 GMT
On 2018-02-10, Gilles wrote:

> Is there a convention for distinguishing codes with
> compatibility requirements from codes provided as
> development tools (unit tests, benchmarking, usage
> examples, integration tests, ...)?

In Compress we once had a package named _internal_ and a package level
javadoc that said "This package is not part of Commons Compress'
published API."

There also is a package that says "Experimental" in its javadocs, but to
be honest it hasn't change din years (but likely isn't really used by
anybody either).


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message