ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chen, Pei" <Pei.C...@childrens.harvard.edu>
Subject RE: INFRA-5079 (cTAKES svn import)
Date Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:44:53 GMT
Yes Jörn.  Since we already have the latest export of the code already in the current Apache
SVN, I would prefer with #1 mainly for simplicity.  It may not be so straightforward to merge
code/fixes especially once we start renaming project folders and namespaces.  If others are
okay with it, we can ask to close the infra-5079 jira and move forward with the latest svn
codebase sans the old revision history; for the unlikely chance we may need the history, we
can go to SF files or the dump file.

--Pei

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jörn Kottmann [mailto:kottmann@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 10:13 AM
> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: INFRA-5079 (cTAKES svn import)
> 
> There is already a ping on the issue from the 7th September, but there was
> no reply since then.
> 
> Jörn
> 
> On 09/11/2012 11:36 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> > Did you hear anything regarding this? Otherwise we either proceed with
> > #1/#2 or by now we can also ping the infra guys.
> >
> > Jörn
> >
> > On 08/30/2012 05:15 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> >> Hi Guys,
> >>
> >> +1 to option #3 as well, with a deadline of say early next week. If
> >> it's not done by
> >> early next week, #1 or #2 sound fine.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Chris
> >>
> >> On Aug 30, 2012, at 8:11 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 to do alternative 3 for a while. The last mail which said they
> >>> do it Wednesday sounded to me like it will happen really soon.
> >>>
> >>> Jörn
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 08/30/2012 04:57 PM, Chen, Pei wrote:
> >>>> Hi cTAKES Mentors,
> >>>> The request to perform the svn import is taking longer than
> >>>> anticipated (It's been some time now with several follow up's with
> >>>> infra, but still no luck)...
> >>>> Any suggestions here to move the incubation process along?
> >>>>
> >>>> Throwing out some alternatives:
> >>>> 1) Do we really need the full revision history from SF on Apache?
> >>>> It would be nice, but don't want to wait indefinitely to begin
> >>>> coding either.
> >>>> 2) We start development on the apache svn. Ask infra if it's
> >>>> possible to preserve this folder when they perform the import, and
> >>>> we perform a merge any time after the import. This would mean
> >>>> developers would have to configure their workspace multiple times
> >>>> and we'll need to figure out the merges.
> >>>> 3) Continue waiting for infra.
> >>>>
> >>>> Open to ideas...
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Pei
> >>
> >>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++
> >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> >> Senior Computer Scientist
> >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> >> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> >> WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> >>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++
> >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University
> >> of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> >>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++
> >>
> >


Mime
View raw message