ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chen, Pei" <Pei.C...@childrens.harvard.edu>
Subject RE: Aren't the *-res dependencies backwards?
Date Wed, 08 May 2013 19:03:39 GMT
I finally got a chance to look into this again, but noticed 2 things:
1) The various TypeSystem.xml files doesn't/shouldn't need to be in the resource/models projects.
 I think that was an oversight on my part last time.
2) I noticed that some of the projects have drivers or main classes which I assume a lot of
folks are able to and plan to run pipelines directly from individual projects.  If this is
true, then I think it is actually easier to leave it as is and default to have the corresponding
-res dependency in the pom.xml.  Since it's maven controlled now, an external app can always
add  <exclude ctakes-drug-ner-res/>.  This is just based on observation--  otherwise,
each project will need to think about *-res during runtime if it's not in the pom.xml. 

Updated in r.1480409  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chen, Pei [mailto:Pei.Chen@childrens.harvard.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 8:59 PM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Aren't the *-res dependencies backwards?
> Steve,
> I think that would make sense...  should be fairly straightforward and
> transparent change.  I can take a closer look next week with a clear mind.
> ________________________________________
> From: Steven Bethard [steven.bethard@Colorado.EDU]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:46 AM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: Aren't the *-res dependencies backwards?
> On Apr 11, 2013, at 8:05 AM, "Masanz, James J."
> <Masanz.James@mayo.edu> wrote:
> >
> > And ctakes-drug-ner-res is listed within the Maven Dependencies for
> ctakes-drug-ner
> Shouldn't it be exactly the opposite of this? Shouldn't ctakes-drug-ner-res
> depend on ctakes-drug-ner? Otherwise, Maven's always going to pull in
> ctakes-drug-ner-res whenever you use ctakes-drug-ner. I.e. with the current
> setup, it's impossible to depend on just the code, not the models.
> Steve

View raw message