ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Masanz, James J." <Masanz.Ja...@mayo.edu>
Subject RE: converting annotators to uimafit
Date Thu, 16 May 2013 12:41:31 GMT
big +1 from me for converting more to uimaFit

From: dev-return-1596-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@ctakes.apache.org [dev-return-1596-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@ctakes.apache.org]
on behalf of Chen, Pei [Pei.Chen@childrens.harvard.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 5:47 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: RE: converting annotators to uimafit

+1 for uimaFIT parameters
However, we should double check it supports all of the different object types for parameters
(Lists, etc.)

uimaFIT is currently being integrated into UIMA as an add-on and it looks like it's currently
in their sandbox.
It may be a good idea to ping dev@uima to see when they plan to release uimaFIT with UIMA
(to avoid another namespace change from our current uimaFIT dependency).


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Miller [mailto:timothy.miller@childrens.harvard.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 6:07 PM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: converting annotators to uimafit
> I think the uimaFIT way of handling parameters for annotators is great, are
> we considering converting? If so I'll be happy to start doing it for some of the
> main annotators. But even if we are do we know what the status is of the
> uima/uimaFIT integration? Like, if we switched everything over to uimafit
> would we have to change everything as soon as there is another uima
> release?
> Tim
View raw message