ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Finan, Sean" <Sean.Fi...@childrens.harvard.edu>
Subject RE: uimafit version and commit messages [EXTERNAL]
Date Fri, 01 Dec 2017 13:18:56 GMT
Hi Alex,

Thank you for the heads-up.

I did notice your checkin and you have nothing but my respect for taking the initiative. 
I haven't tested the update on another project for any ill happenstance, but a colleague and
ctakes pmc (Chen Lin, master of doctimerel among other things) did run (post-clean) an external
project pipeline that uses (some of) ctakes as a dependency and didn't see any problems. 
Plus, if Richard says that it is safe then it is safe.  Uimafit has been a boon to ctakes
and I trust him, Phil and Steven (the creators) as developers.

Cheers,
Sean

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexandru Zbarcea [mailto:alexz@apache.org] 
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 6:20 PM
To: Apache cTAKES Dev
Subject: Re: uimafit version and commit messages [EXTERNAL]

Hi Richard and David,

Thank you for your support and suggestions. As you correctly identified, upgrading UIMA to
2.4.0 has been made without issues ([1] or [2]).

Sean, Tim, I look forward to your feedback related to latest commits. Let me know if you see
something out of order. I also know that you have cTAKES integrated into different projects
and I wouldn't like to break them. I know that community's integration stability is very important.
That is why I am currently looking in fixing the integration tests which it seems that they
were left behind. Some modules' pom.xml are explicitly setting them to be skipped. This is
why the Jenkins job ctakes-trunk-compiletest succeeds and cTAKES-trunk-Java-1.8 fails.

Alex

[1] - git:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_ctakes_commit_1655d78184afddf230a8f8cdf5ff06ebbabd80fb&d=DwIBaQ&c=qS4goWBT7poplM69zy_3xhKwEW14JZMSdioCoppxeFU&r=fs67GvlGZstTpyIisCYNYmQCP6r0bcpKGd4f7d4gTao&m=BxgCVJdXY7vIONsCFUo-gFrRUI3gaz2iUMWrfzF7K1U&s=dv74AM48-Dxy-hD_Pc5_gU8-AWA0DYXvQVkBaC1J4ng&e=
[2] - svn: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__svn.apache.org_repos_asf_ctakes_trunk_-3Fp-3D1816776&d=DwIBaQ&c=qS4goWBT7poplM69zy_3xhKwEW14JZMSdioCoppxeFU&r=fs67GvlGZstTpyIisCYNYmQCP6r0bcpKGd4f7d4gTao&m=BxgCVJdXY7vIONsCFUo-gFrRUI3gaz2iUMWrfzF7K1U&s=I1xIRBI0UMmVKyBOYMVR-ZkR_uT68qqMThe9TfRfYZ8&e=
[3] -
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_C_view_Apache-2520cTAKES_job_ctakes-2Dtrunk-2Dcompiletest_&d=DwIBaQ&c=qS4goWBT7poplM69zy_3xhKwEW14JZMSdioCoppxeFU&r=fs67GvlGZstTpyIisCYNYmQCP6r0bcpKGd4f7d4gTao&m=BxgCVJdXY7vIONsCFUo-gFrRUI3gaz2iUMWrfzF7K1U&s=pGosmM6iJ1odWM4iuFr1n3kOVCG7x-qieC8Em9SE8_A&e=
[4] -
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__builds.apache.org_view_C_view_Apache-2520cTAKES_job_cTAKES-2Dtrunk-2DJava-2D1.8_&d=DwIBaQ&c=qS4goWBT7poplM69zy_3xhKwEW14JZMSdioCoppxeFU&r=fs67GvlGZstTpyIisCYNYmQCP6r0bcpKGd4f7d4gTao&m=BxgCVJdXY7vIONsCFUo-gFrRUI3gaz2iUMWrfzF7K1U&s=6eSar20K-yASfdHZmfmmEbkiFE5DDwSwV3s3frCWQUw&e=

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho <rec@apache.org>
wrote:

> The uimaFIT releases mainly fix bugs and add smaller features.
> It should be pretty safe to update to 2.4.0. I didn't face any 
> problems upgrading e.g. DKPro Core which is pretty large and uses 
> uimaFIT intensively.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard (atm maintaining uimaFIT)
>
> > On 28.11.2017, at 01:45, David Kincaid <kincaid.dave@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for upgrading uimafit. I was thinking of giving it a try 
> > myself
> when
> > I had a chance. I see that you upgrades to 2.30, but the most recent 
> > version is 2.4.0. Was there a problem with 2.4.0?
> >
> > - Dave
>
>
Mime
View raw message