ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From gandhi rajan <gandhiraja...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ctake web service [EXTERNAL]
Date Fri, 08 Mar 2019 15:02:00 GMT
Hi Kathy,

I guess the initializations happens in post construct method. So if we
could synchronize that I feel we can get away from the problem.
Unfortunately I m not able to tet this as my setup is gone with my old job.
Try it out.

Regards,
Gandhi.

On Friday, March 8, 2019, Kathy Ferro <healthcare1111@gmail.com> wrote:

> Tim,
>
> Thanks for reply.  I'm continuing the research.  With all the layers that
> wrap around this, you would think we can handle this suggestion.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:01 PM Miller, Timothy <
> Timothy.Miller@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> > That's a good question that I've also heard from others, and
> unfortunately
> > I don't know the answer. My use cases are typically a single job at a
> time
> > making sequential calls, so I wasn't stressing it with multiple
> > asynchronous calls. I would've thought that the Tomcat container would
> have
> > some ability to manage that though!
> > Tim
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Kathy Ferro <healthcare1111@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 6:10 PM
> > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: ctake web service [EXTERNAL]
> >
> > Tim,
> >
> > Does docker solution handle multiple instances?  I tested the Rest Web
> > Service with 2 requests at the same time, it errors out.  I removed the
> > part that write the result xml file to the disc; it still error out.
> >
> > Best,
> > Kathy
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:52 AM Miller, Timothy <
> > Timothy.Miller@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't know what the solution was, but I leave my ctakes REST server
> > > running basically full time and haven't seen time outs yet.
> > > Tim
> > >
> > > ________________________________________
> > > From: gandhi rajan <gandhirajan.n@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 10:43 AM
> > > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: ctake web service [EXTERNAL]
> > >
> > > Hi Kathy, Sean did respond that there is no timeout happening from
> cTAKES
> > > end. You might probably have to look at database settings for this
> closed
> > > connection issue.
> > >
> > > Does someone have any clue on this?
> > >
> > > On Monday, March 4, 2019, Kathy Ferro <healthcare1111@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Gandhi,
> > > >
> > > > Do you get any response to this issue?  Does it try to keep the
> > > connection
> > > > open while WS is up? Or does it open and close after it's done?
> > > >
> > > > We are still getting this error.
> > > > "ERROR JdbcRareWordDictionary - No operations allowed after statement
> > > > closed."
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Kathy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 9:43 AM Gandhi Rajan Natarajan <
> > > > Gandhi.Natarajan@arisglobal.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Kathy,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sometime back we encountered this issue and the problem seems to
be
> > DB
> > > > > connections getting timed out.
> > > > >
> > > > > Currently we are using the following implementations:
> > > > >
> > > "org.apache.ctakes.dictionary.lookup2.dictionary.
> JdbcRareWordDictionary"
> > > > > and "org.apache.ctakes.dictionary.lookup2.concept.
> JdbcConceptFactory"
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anybody aware of any timeout settings that needs to be done
in
> > > these
> > > > > implementations to avoid DB connection timeout issue?
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Kathy Ferro <healthcare1111@gmail.com>
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 11:07 PM
> > > > > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: ctake web service
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Just want to see if anybody has experience this issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > If the web service had been up for a day or two, it will drop the
> > > > > dictionary lookup.  The only result it returns are
> > ConllDependencyNode
> > > > tag
> > > > > in the xmi file;  no mention, no concept, etc...
> > > > >
> > > > > I haven't have a chance to investigate it, yet.
> > > > >
> > > > > Kathy
> > > > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> > > > intended
> > > > > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
> > > > addressed.
> > > > > If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate,
> > > distribute
> > > > > or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender or system manager by
> > > email
> > > > > immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete
> > this
> > > > > e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you
> > are
> > > > > notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any
> action
> > in
> > > > > reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited
> > and
> > > > > against the law.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Gandhi
> > >
> > > "The best way to find urself is to lose urself in the service of others
> > > !!!"
> > >
> >
>


-- 
Regards,
Gandhi

"The best way to find urself is to lose urself in the service of others !!!"

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message