db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Satheesh Bandaram <sathe...@Sourcery.Org>
Subject Re: [WWD] review suspended - rewrite coming
Date Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:57:19 GMT
Andrew McIntyre wrote:

>> java -jar lib/derbytools.jar sysinfo
>> java -jar lib/derbytools.jar dblook
>> etc.
>> I have a prototype for this that I'll post to derby-dev.
>> andrew
> java -jar lib/derbytools.jar ij

IJ started without using the scripts seems to need a JDBC URL to
connect. This may not be obvious to everyone and may seem odd to
non-JDBC/java users. Should IJ (and other tools) be changed to assume
"jdbc:derby:" protocol by default, if not provided? IJ is Derby's SQL
processor, so it seems it should be ok to assume derby URL format, if
none provided?


> I wanted to give everyone a heads up that I'll incorporate the cool
> work Andrew did on http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1019. To
> reduce confusion, I'm suspending the review.  I will be presenting a
> revised outline for WWD then rework the initial sections and restart
> the review process.

View raw message