db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Katherine Marsden <kmarsdende...@sbcglobal.net>
Subject Re: Is it expected that each class loader context gets its own in memory database
Date Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:37:34 GMT
On 10/22/2012 9:50 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
> On 10/22/12 9:03 AM, Katherine Marsden wrote:
>> On 10/22/2012 8:50 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
>>>  And that would lead me to expect that each engine (and therefore 
>>> class loader) would get its own, separate namespace of in-memory 
>>> databases.
>> It would be good if Kristian can confirm that  this is the design and 
>> then maybe we can add a blurb to the documentation to that effect.
> Just a heads-up that this may take a little time. He's on paternity 
> leave until early next year so he may not see this email thread for a 
> while
  I think then I will just wait for a bit and assume that if nobody else 
comments I will just assume it is by design.  Looking briefly at the 
code and your comments it appears to me that that is the case.

View raw message