directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Enrique Rodriguez <>
Subject Re: [gump] done with it
Date Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:32:37 GMT
Brett Porter wrote:
>>Hence, we should support Continuum, but should not withdraw from GUMP.
> This has really been the plan all along. I will maintain the gump
> descriptors. However, Gump is not ever going to cut it as a continuous
> integration tool for individual projects, because AFAIK that's not its
> goals.
> As far as your previous points about how easy it is to work with gump -
> it's not a lot of fun, but its manageable. It's not something I think
> the whole team should have to put themselves through. I've made a Maven
> plugin that eases this.
> So, as it stands - the best situation is to use them side by side, as
> you've said, and as far as I'm concerned that's what we'll do. Is
> everyone ok with this?

+1 to Brett maintaining them side-by-side.


> - - Brett
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Cygwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
> hO58SGmAWLlORpKC//cEE6U=
> =ps44

View raw message