directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <>
Subject Re: Moving ldapstuio and triplesec out of trunks ?
Date Wed, 03 Jan 2007 03:32:05 GMT
Do we do this for shared and for clients and for the daemon stuff too?


Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Alex Karasulu a écrit :
>> Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> what about moving those guys down one level? It's really painfull to 
>>> have to dowload mb of jars when you want to check out the trunks...
>> Yeap those jars are a problem.  How about we put them in a maven REPO?
> no, this is not what I had in mind. The main problem is that ldapstudio 
> and ADS are pretty much separate project. It's not really obvious that 
> they must share the same trunk. Triplesec is also a separate project. 
> And at some point, I'm not sure that it is a good idea to have a common 
> pom.xml for all those guys in trunks, because them it will be mor and 
> more difficult to guarantee that trunks is always 'buildable' at all 
> time : too many people will risk to break the build with a bad commit, 
> and it will take too long to build the whole project before committing.
>>> We could have such a structure :
>> Yeah we were using this structure except we were calling trunks -> 
>> trunk instead.  Then someone had the idea of keeping all trunks 
>> together in a trunks directory.
> I think it made sense when it was about ads itself. Now with ldapstudio 
> representing half the size of ADS itself, and triplesec being a fat baby 
> too, I'm not sure it worth it anymore.
>> I think this was Enrique's idea.  Perhaps he can elaborate on why we 
>> did this.  I no longer remember why but just got used to this 
>> configuration.
> The 'why' should remain history, at this point. What was good a year ago 
> may not be good now, IMHO. The separation could make sense now, and we 
> may go back to a grand-reunification in one year, I don't know. Right 
> now, my guts ask for a little separation, like what we did for MINA (not 
> that I want ldapstudio to become a TLP :).

View raw message