From dev-return-28013-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Tue Nov 18 16:12:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80773 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2008 16:12:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Nov 2008 16:12:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 2208 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2008 16:12:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 2162 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2008 16:12:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 2151 invoked by uid 99); 18 Nov 2008 16:12:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:12:27 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.16 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.16] (HELO mail-gx0-f16.google.com) (209.85.217.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:11:06 +0000 Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so1791889gxk.1 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:10:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=h95voxVIimTOTp6mw4AhqLf9LF9uDpk0XYrHYaf5Yss=; b=Eh568g53/7ozyKw5Hr2TsGbk/BnpGUgRCW7/6MUMaPI45dw3LyPHa5oXWGjMOyixV0 FeQ+pNLAOLdGDAJQKD3rf/gx+Q8VsfwbKeU0wRLNQkFFxhGCf6HSI0aYiYPVHzPtrkYf 4S7u9LezSgH6LRIZ5TG540vLssUQhSPFOuSCg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=klnHPV82CgxwSjHuHkHB+Ka9XruxSEgvkBNMq+LmtqOyipboz3ucAAsE301T+60ocp +R8IkRMFPoWEtHyEE9mQSSGTbbnO/1mQYfB0/p16iXezsUfgi7oVtegzGvrwaJ+XCCyr cFz84sgLfuRr1Rgr7aOenLQSsG7g7P9usII8I= Received: by 10.65.233.16 with SMTP id k16mr27161qbr.40.1227024403506; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:06:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.93.1 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:06:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <98d8c0860811180806n5844dd15xd3aa81795bf0aa03@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:06:43 +0100 From: "Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot" Sender: pajbam@gmail.com To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Re: [VOTE] [Results] [Studio] Release of Apache Directory Studio 1.3.0 In-Reply-To: <98d8c0860811180739l58910b3ewa48084d04dd0242a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_69297_23473469.1227024403487" References: <98d8c0860811120645p3ac190e8u84d53bebe1d7baa2@mail.gmail.com> <491B2B23.5050502@apache.org> <98d8c0860811180737h40a5b89bl7fd8acdb41a997c4@mail.gmail.com> <98d8c0860811180739l58910b3ewa48084d04dd0242a@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: a0950ef979253149 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_69297_23473469.1227024403487 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, This vote is now closed. Here are the results: - 4 +1 votes - Kiran Ayyagari - Emmanuel L=E9charny - Stefan Seelmann - Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot - no +/-0 vote - no -1 vote Now, the question is "what should we do exactly?" as not all agreed on the way of handling this. My personal feeling would be to just update the website and remove the occurrences of "RC2". I don't think we really need to repackage the packages released for version RC2 (which would consume more time, bandwidth, space on mirrors and svn repos). Other ideas? WDYT? Thanks, Pierre-Arnaud ------=_Part_69297_23473469.1227024403487 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi all,

This vote is now closed.

Here are the results:
  • 4 +1 = votes
    • Kiran Ayyagari
    • Emmanuel L=E9charny
    • Stefan Seelmann
    • Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
  • no +/-0 vote
  • no -1 vote
Now, the question is "what s= hould we do exactly?" as not all agreed on the way of handling this.
My personal feeling would be to just update the website and remove the = occurrences of "RC2".
I don't think we really need to repa= ckage the packages released for version RC2 (which would consume more time,= bandwidth, space on mirrors and svn repos).
Other ideas?
WDYT?

Thanks,
Pierre-Arnaud ------=_Part_69297_23473469.1227024403487--