directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lecharny <>
Subject Re: [server.xml] Discussion
Date Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:41:25 GMT
ayyagarikiran wrote:
>> Right, I forgot to mention that. There is also something about Quartz 
>> integration.
> hmm, isn't this a mandatory service which should run? ( which uses the 
> LDAP store to store its job info )
yes, but we might need to configure it, nope ?
>> At some point, having a monolithic server.xml will be totally 
>> unmanageable. May be we should think about a more versatile system, 
>> with sub files ?
> hmm, IMHO configuring a system with more than one file may cause 
> frustration to the user.
That's true, but configuring a system with a configuration  file 
thousands lines long is also painful...

cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel L├ęcharny

View raw message