directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot>
Subject Re: Changes to have a consistent naming in controls
Date Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:21:34 GMT

However, I'm not sure we need to change BasicControl to an interface. 
It would just be an empty interface extending the Control interface. Not that useful to me.
I would rather stay with the existing class, as is.


On 2 févr. 2011, at 14:47, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:

> Hi guys,
> I have listed all he controls we currently support, and I have some renaming to suggest
to have a consistent naming scheme. First, let's see what is the current hierarchy and the
changes I propose :
> - all controls are implementing the Control interface
> - we have an interface for each control, except for BasicControl : I suggest we change
the BasicControl to become an interface, and that we create a BasicControlImpl class
> - all the control intefraces starting with a *I* should be renamed by removing this *I*
(that's 7 controls to rename)
> I have still to analyze the decorators hierarchy.
> thoughts ?
> -- 
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny

View raw message