directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lécharny <>
Subject Re: Accessing SchemaPartition and SingleFileLdifPartition directly
Date Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:22:49 GMT
On 12/5/11 4:09 PM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny<>wrote:
>> On 12/4/11 8:23 PM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
>>> BTW,
>>> If passing null as CoreSession is ok on AbstractBTreePartition(Schema and
>>> Config Partitions.) operations, i might use some pointers about how to use
>>> them best.
>>> Pointers on SearchEngine usage could save me lots of hours also.
>>  From the top of my head, you need a CoreSession because you need a
>> reference on the SchemaManager which is hold by the Session (in fact, we
>> use an OperationContext, which contains a Session).
>> The Partition will manipulate indexes, and for that, we need the
>> SchemaManager, as it is the only place we have information about
>> AttributeType names and OIDs, as Index are referring AT names or OID.
> Yeah Partition uses schemaManager heavily, but it is not getting the
> SchemaManager instance from the OperationContext, it is using the
> SchemaManager instance which is set by
> AbstractPartition.setSchemaManager(SchemaManager) method at the Partition
> init time. I looked at both partition( schema partition and config
> partition ) and this is what i saw. Am i missing something?

No, I think Pierre-Arnaud is right, I might have overseen the way it works.

Emmanuel Lécharny

View raw message