directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Radovan Semancik <>
Subject Re: LDAP API JNDI operations
Date Mon, 22 Oct 2018 08:07:32 GMT

Perfectly OK with me. I do not really see any point in mixing JNDI and 
Apache Directory API.

Radovan Semancik
Software Architect

On 10/21/18 21:25, Emmanuel L├ęcharny wrote:
> Hi !
> I'm finishing up the Decorator removal, and I'm alsmost done (still have
> to process the IntermediateResponse).
> At this point, I'm facing an issue with a JNDI conversion function :
> public javax.naming.ldap.ExtendedRequest toJndi( final ExtendedRequest
> modelRequest ) throws EncoderException
> The problem is that we have to convert an ExtendedRequest value to a
> byte[], while we don't store anymore this value (what's the point of
> doing so when we can find out which ext op has been called ?)
> This is used by the StoredProcedure interceptor in the server, as SP are
> still using the JNDI interface. Two things here :
> - SP aren't working at the moment. There have been way too much water
> running under the bridge
> - If we want to revive SP, then it will have to use the LDAP API interface
> So I strongly suggest we get rid of this method, if nobody objects.
> Otherwise, and if we look a but further, we should probably get rid of
> all the JNDI conversions methods, at least in the LDAP API v3.0
> Thoughts ?

View raw message