directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (DIRAPI-239) Client API exposes implementation classes of common-pools
Date Sun, 12 May 2019 05:53:00 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRAPI-239:
-------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 2.0.0)
                   2.0.0.AM3

> Client API exposes implementation classes of common-pools
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRAPI-239
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-239
>             Project: Directory Client API
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0-M30
>            Reporter: Federico Marmori
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.0.0.AM3
>
>
> The  constructors:
> LdapConnectionPool(LdapConnectionConfig connectionConfig, LdapApiService apiService,
long timeout, org.apache.commons.pool.impl.GenericObjectPool.Config poolConfig)
> and 
> LdapConnectionPool(org.apache.commons.pool.PoolableObjectFactory<LdapConnection>
factory, org.apache.commons.pool.impl.GenericObjectPool.Config poolConfig)
> ...allows the user to provide its own pool configuration.
> However, using the Config object is really a bad idea. This forces the user code to depend
on an implementation class of the commons-pool library, which will break any OSGI deployment
and force the user to implement tedious workarounds. Probably common-pools could solve the
issue by exposing the Config object in the API, however the DIRAPI can fix the issue by making
sure that the LdapConnectionPool either:
> - expose all pool configuration attributes in a constructor instead of the GenericObjectPool.Config
> - provide its own LdapPoolConfiguration bean object instead of using the GenericObjectPool.Config
> - provide an LdapConnectionPoolFactory instead



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message