kwart commented on a change in pull request #40: URL: https://github.com/apache/directory-server/pull/40#discussion_r487009598 ########## File path: all/pom.xml ########## @@ -163,11 +163,11 @@ true - org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15on + *:* Review comment: We can keep the smaller scope, but I think we never want to include the signature files. So upgrade of a library which suddenly starts to sign its JARs wouldn't require the filter change. @coheigea So do you think we should have the smaller scope and filter the libraries with signed classes if a need comes? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: users@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@directory.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@directory.apache.org