drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Frantz <jfra...@maprtech.com>
Subject Re: Market watch/design input
Date Thu, 06 Sep 2012 21:45:26 GMT
Right. The difference in the two papers is that Dremel has an efficient
encoding for a disk-resident dataset, whereas PowerDrill has an efficient
encoding for a memory-resident dataset.

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:22 PM, karthik tunga <karthik.tunga@gmail.com>wrote:

> If we assume the the data fits in memory, couldn't dremel do the same thing
> ?
>
> On 5 September 2012 12:58, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Excellent idea.  As Tomer indicates, with a flexible scan operator, this
> > should be quite doable.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Michael Hausenblas <
> > michael.hausenblas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > Yes it is easy.  It indicates what you can do if you have stuff in
> > memory
> > > > and have a good index.
> > >
> > > Thanks, understood. However, I'd like to come back to my initial
> message
> > > and make a more explicit proposal: 'Include PowerDrill design and
> > insights
> > > as an input into our design'.
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message