drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Parser
Date Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:01:00 GMT

> You should read the dremel and dryad papers that Jason sent out a while ago.

Let's assume I've read all the papers. Wasn't there a (soft) ETA for some design slides proposal
from the MapR side (or maybe I'm mixing up stuff??)

Cheers,
	   Michael

--
Michael Hausenblas
Ireland, Europe
http://mhausenblas.info/

On 13 Sep 2012, at 17:51, Ted Dunning wrote:

> You should read the dremel and dryad papers that Jason sent out a while ago.
> 
> See https://github.com/ApacheDrill/Brainstorm/wiki/Apache-Drill-Links
> 
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:46 AM, NAVEEN MAANJU <
> naveen.maanju.apache@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Thanks Camuel.
>> 
>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Camuel Gilyadov <camuel@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> This is OpenDremel's team suggestion for one:
>>> http://www.slideshare.net/CamuelGilyadov/presentations
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Michael Hausenblas <
>>> michael.hausenblas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> any documentation to get idea bout project and architecture?
>>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>> I was about to ask re this as well - pretty please, with sugar on top
>> of
>>>> it? ;)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>           Michael
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Michael Hausenblas
>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>> http://mhausenblas.info/
>>>> 
>>>> On 13 Sep 2012, at 15:23, NAVEEN MAANJU wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> any documentation to get idea bout project and architecture?
>>>>> 
>>>>> +1 maven
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Arun Yadav <arunwizz@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1 for maven however, would welcome better option if any.
>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2012 2:45 AM, "Ben Flint" <bflint@popcap.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> +1 for maven.  Gradle wouldn't be bad either if it's flexibility
>>> we're
>>>>>>> after.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 9/12/12 1:53 PM, "Vladimir Klimontovich" <
>> klimontovich@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I guess ant is good too if it's used together with ivy.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Camuel Gilyadov <
>> camuel@gmail.com
>>>> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> What is wrong with good old Ant?
>>>>>>>>> I can live with maven too...   it just has too many gotchas
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 9/12/12, Julien Le Dem <julien@twitter.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for maven.
>>>>>>>>>> Could those against please suggest alternatives?
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>>> Julien
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Camuel Gilyadov
<
>>> camuel@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> -1 for maven.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/12/12, Constantine Peresypkin <pconstantine@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> If build system is evil it's better to build
it manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 for maven
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Michael
Hausenblas <
>>>>>>>>>>>> michael.hausenblas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that no-one has mentioned
this before but what about
>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>> system for drill?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm personally in favor of maven
(lesser evil for java IMO).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd be happy to contribute that setup,
if needed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If codebase mainly in Java, yeah maven
(though it feels like
>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> downloads
>>>>>>>>>>>>> half of the Internet every time).
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But not so fast - did we agree on Java,
yet? How about Scala
>> +
>>>>>> SBT
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Integrates nicely with Java and is soooo
much more productive
>>> ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>          Michael
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://www.scala-sbt.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michael Hausenblas
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://mhausenblas.info/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12 Sep 2012, at 20:47, David Alves
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that no-one has mentioned
this before but what about
>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>> system for drill?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm personally in favor of maven
(lesser evil for java IMO).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd be happy to contribute that setup,
if needed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -david
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ted
Dunning <
>>>>>> ted.dunning@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see classes in the source tree:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser/tree/master/src/org/apache/drill/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>> parsers/impl/drqlantlr/autogen/classes/org/apache/drill/parsers/impl/dr
>>>>>>>>>>> qlantlr/autogen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, I would strongly recommend
pulling the antlr source
>>> code
>>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> antler source tree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:31
AM, Camuel Gilyadov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <camuel@bigdatacraft.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still work in progress, but
anyway -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Constructive critique and
contributions are welcome
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my mobile device
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Sent from my mobile device
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Vladimir Klimontovich
>>>>>>>> Cell: +7-926-890-2349, skype: klimontovich
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message