drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: branding and technical trivial items
Date Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:36:59 GMT
What about the other diagonal drill?  Seems more artistic to me.

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Michael Hausenblas <
michael.hausenblas@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > Tomer seems to have created or had created a drill logo for the bay area
> > users' group.  See
> > http://www.meetup.com/Bay-Area-Apache-Drill-User-Group/in the upper
> > left.
> >
> > What is the sense of the group about whether this or something like it
> > should be our logo?  I don't really want to have a month-long discussion
> of
> > a logo, but we should have one eventually and deciding early is probably
> > easier than later.
> >
> > Associated with that, is there a bright spark who feels that they could
> do
> > lots better?  If so, have at it and let's discuss the options.
>
> Good enough for now, hence +1 …
>
> I've adopted it at:
>
> * G+ page https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/106081196028708015488/
> * http://drill-user.org/
>
> Note: Tomer, when you get around, please provide us with a high-res
> version via the repo - this one I'm currently using is really utterly
> shitty, resolution-wise ;)
>
> Cheers,
>            Michael
>
> --
> Michael Hausenblas
> Ireland, Europe
> http://mhausenblas.info/
>
> On 15 Oct 2012, at 23:36, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> > Three questions here, none of which have to do with technical substance.
> >
> > ----- Branding -----
> >
> > Tomer seems to have created or had created a drill logo for the bay area
> > users' group.  See
> > http://www.meetup.com/Bay-Area-Apache-Drill-User-Group/in the upper
> > left.
> >
> > What is the sense of the group about whether this or something like it
> > should be our logo?  I don't really want to have a month-long discussion
> of
> > a logo, but we should have one eventually and deciding early is probably
> > easier than later.
> >
> > Associated with that, is there a bright spark who feels that they could
> do
> > lots better?  If so, have at it and let's discuss the options.
> >
> >
> > ----- Technical -----
> >
> > I have been saying "logical plan" for the (hopefully) universal
> > representation that comes out of the parser plus some semantic steps.
> > Jason and Julian have indicated that a more standard term would be
> > "physical plan".  I am happy to switch the plan doc to standard
> > nomenclature.
> >
> > What say ye all?
> >
> > Along similar lines, it appears that database articles have DAG's that
> flow
> > upwards.  I have been drawing them downwards simply because that is the
> > default in Omnigraffle.  I can invert and draw them going upwards if it
> is
> > the consensus that it matters/is preferable.
> >
> > What say ye to this?
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message