What about the other diagonal drill? Seems more artistic to me.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Michael Hausenblas <
michael.hausenblas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Tomer seems to have created or had created a drill logo for the bay area
> > users' group. See
> > http://www.meetup.com/Bay-Area-Apache-Drill-User-Group/in the upper
> > left.
> >
> > What is the sense of the group about whether this or something like it
> > should be our logo? I don't really want to have a month-long discussion
> of
> > a logo, but we should have one eventually and deciding early is probably
> > easier than later.
> >
> > Associated with that, is there a bright spark who feels that they could
> do
> > lots better? If so, have at it and let's discuss the options.
>
> Good enough for now, hence +1 …
>
> I've adopted it at:
>
> * G+ page https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/106081196028708015488/
> * http://drill-user.org/
>
> Note: Tomer, when you get around, please provide us with a high-res
> version via the repo - this one I'm currently using is really utterly
> shitty, resolution-wise ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
> --
> Michael Hausenblas
> Ireland, Europe
> http://mhausenblas.info/
>
> On 15 Oct 2012, at 23:36, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> > Three questions here, none of which have to do with technical substance.
> >
> > ----- Branding -----
> >
> > Tomer seems to have created or had created a drill logo for the bay area
> > users' group. See
> > http://www.meetup.com/Bay-Area-Apache-Drill-User-Group/in the upper
> > left.
> >
> > What is the sense of the group about whether this or something like it
> > should be our logo? I don't really want to have a month-long discussion
> of
> > a logo, but we should have one eventually and deciding early is probably
> > easier than later.
> >
> > Associated with that, is there a bright spark who feels that they could
> do
> > lots better? If so, have at it and let's discuss the options.
> >
> >
> > ----- Technical -----
> >
> > I have been saying "logical plan" for the (hopefully) universal
> > representation that comes out of the parser plus some semantic steps.
> > Jason and Julian have indicated that a more standard term would be
> > "physical plan". I am happy to switch the plan doc to standard
> > nomenclature.
> >
> > What say ye all?
> >
> > Along similar lines, it appears that database articles have DAG's that
> flow
> > upwards. I have been drawing them downwards simply because that is the
> > default in Omnigraffle. I can invert and draw them going upwards if it
> is
> > the consensus that it matters/is preferable.
> >
> > What say ye to this?
>
>
|