Well, much of it is in JIRA.
The fact that it isn't in the version control is what I was referring to
when I mentioned the lack of commit-often behavior.
The logical plan parser is committed already, but none of the interpreter
work is committed. Jacques is working off of a private git clone and I
have been pushing for more frequent pushes to a visible repo where I can
echo his work into the sandbox, but I have had little effect in that regard
so far.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>wrote:
> I'm really curious why none of this is on the Drill JIRA or in it's version
> control.
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > - There have been several proposals for syntax conventions for the
> logical
> > plan language. Three versions have been built. I built a version along
> > the lines of LLVM and a JSON based version that used a constructor
> > convention along with tight binding of classes to operator types.
> Jacques
> > built a version on Jackson which used much looser binding and supported
> DAG
> > structuring much more easily. Overall, I feel that Jacques
> implementation
> > dominates the ones that I have done in essentially every way. I think we
> > should go with his style.
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
|