Now the document has been modified, changing my vote:
+1 (non-binding)
Julian
On Oct 10, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Tomer Shiran <tshiran@gmail.com> wrote:
> The document should have had that sentence removed so that there's no
> difference between merge scenario and normal commit scenario. I fixed it
> now.
>
> I assume everyone else voted based on the assumption that this was removed,
> as it was discussed on the list, so I won't restart the vote unless someone
> really wants to. Anyone can, of course, change their vote prior to the vote
> closing.
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Tomer said that it makes sense to remove ", unless the code change
>> represents a merge from a branch, in which case three +1s are required” but
>> the bylaws still contain that clause.
>>
>> -1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Julian
>>
>>
>> On Oct 9, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Tomer Shiran <tshiran@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> In order for Drill to graduate to a TLP, we need to finalize the project's
>> bylaws. I am restarting the vote here based on the feedback and discussions
>> on the list:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DRILL/Proposed+Bylaws
>>
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours. It will close on Oct 12, 3pm PT. I will
>> then send out the TLP graduation vote.
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1
>>
>> Please indicate whether your vote is binding or non-binding.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tomer
>>
|