drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julian Hyde <julianh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Drill bylaws
Date Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:05:47 GMT
Now the document has been modified, changing my vote:

+1 (non-binding)

Julian

On Oct 10, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Tomer Shiran <tshiran@gmail.com> wrote:

> The document should have had that sentence removed so that there's no
> difference between merge scenario and normal commit scenario. I fixed it
> now.
> 
> I assume everyone else voted based on the assumption that this was removed,
> as it was discussed on the list, so I won't restart the vote unless someone
> really wants to. Anyone can, of course, change their vote prior to the vote
> closing.
> 
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> Tomer said that it makes sense to remove ", unless the code change
>> represents a merge from a branch, in which case three +1s are required” but
>> the bylaws still contain that clause.
>> 
>> -1 (non-binding)
>> 
>> Julian
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 9, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Tomer Shiran <tshiran@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> In order for Drill to graduate to a TLP, we need to finalize the project's
>> bylaws. I am restarting the vote here based on the feedback and discussions
>> on the list:
>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DRILL/Proposed+Bylaws
>> 
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours. It will close on Oct 12, 3pm PT. I will
>> then send out the TLP graduation vote.
>> 
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1
>> 
>> Please indicate whether your vote is binding or non-binding.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tomer
>> 


Mime
View raw message